That hole and 153 ending in mineralisation at those grades created a stir I think.
These latest results aren’t as good, even though they’ve proved more gold.
One thing they don’t show is how those 7 Feb holes related to the new drilling. The cartoons they’ve produced don’t include the 7 Feb drill traces. Not sure why they haven’t done that. Surely follow up holes should have been beneath the ones ending in mineralisation. Especially at 4 to 9 g/t. The MD says this extends the mineralisation to depth, but they’re not showing it. Strange.
7 Feb ann:
View attachment 197589
15 Apr holes:
View attachment 197591